<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Interface Simplicity and SharePoint&#8217;s Central Admin</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.glenc.net/2006/12/05/interface-simplicity-and-sharepoints-central-admin/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.glenc.net/2006/12/05/interface-simplicity-and-sharepoints-central-admin/</link>
	<description>Treading water in a sea of man-made confusion.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 12:14:03 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Liesbeth Kiki</title>
		<link>http://blog.glenc.net/2006/12/05/interface-simplicity-and-sharepoints-central-admin/comment-page-1/#comment-147</link>
		<dc:creator>Liesbeth Kiki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Oct 2007 19:14:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogtmp.glenc.net/2006/12/05/interface-simplicity-and-sharepoints-central-admin/#comment-147</guid>
		<description>that&#039;s why it will never wor. Liesbeth Kiki.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>that&#8217;s why it will never wor. Liesbeth Kiki.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ruud Orlagh</title>
		<link>http://blog.glenc.net/2006/12/05/interface-simplicity-and-sharepoints-central-admin/comment-page-1/#comment-180</link>
		<dc:creator>Ruud Orlagh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2007 16:28:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogtmp.glenc.net/2006/12/05/interface-simplicity-and-sharepoints-central-admin/#comment-180</guid>
		<description>oh we didn&#039;t care,we made it very clea. Ruud Orlagh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oh we didn&#8217;t care,we made it very clea. Ruud Orlagh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amy</title>
		<link>http://blog.glenc.net/2006/12/05/interface-simplicity-and-sharepoints-central-admin/comment-page-1/#comment-146</link>
		<dc:creator>Amy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 12:28:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogtmp.glenc.net/2006/12/05/interface-simplicity-and-sharepoints-central-admin/#comment-146</guid>
		<description>Hi Glen

&quot;I have to stare at the page for 5 minutes and scan each link to remember which item will take me to the options I need.  Not only that, but I frequently have to click on an item to remember &#039;nope - that’s not the one&#039;.&quot;

That is so true.  However I&#039;m still more inclined to follow the Google simplicity way of doing things.  I never have a problem finding or using the more complex functionality they provide ... unlike MSDN and such like that try to drown you in options, trees and information.

Don&#039;t get me wrong, you sometimes need that.  But back to SharePoint, I think it&#039;s main problem is just poor organisation of those links and tabs.  Or perhaps poor organisation from the point of view of a user/administrator/developer in the real world and not the Microsoft world.  I&#039;m sure it makes sense to the experts in Microsoft, but I would gladly offer some suggestions as to how they could reduce the need for searching around those two tabs of overwhelming links (to magical places). ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Glen</p>
<p>&#8220;I have to stare at the page for 5 minutes and scan each link to remember which item will take me to the options I need.  Not only that, but I frequently have to click on an item to remember &#8216;nope &#8211; that’s not the one&#8217;.&#8221;</p>
<p>That is so true.  However I&#8217;m still more inclined to follow the Google simplicity way of doing things.  I never have a problem finding or using the more complex functionality they provide &#8230; unlike MSDN and such like that try to drown you in options, trees and information.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t get me wrong, you sometimes need that.  But back to SharePoint, I think it&#8217;s main problem is just poor organisation of those links and tabs.  Or perhaps poor organisation from the point of view of a user/administrator/developer in the real world and not the Microsoft world.  I&#8217;m sure it makes sense to the experts in Microsoft, but I would gladly offer some suggestions as to how they could reduce the need for searching around those two tabs of overwhelming links (to magical places). <img src='http://blog.glenc.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
