<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Look alive. Here comes a buzzard. &#187; Web development</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.glenc.net/category/web-development/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.glenc.net</link>
	<description>Treading water in a sea of man-made confusion.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 02:34:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Yahoo Grid CSS &#8211; What&#8217;s the Point?</title>
		<link>http://blog.glenc.net/2006/06/22/yahoo-grid-css-whats-the-point/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.glenc.net/2006/06/22/yahoo-grid-css-whats-the-point/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jun 2006 03:10:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>glenc</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Web development]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogtmp.glenc.net/2006/06/22/yahoo-grid-css-whats-the-point/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yahoo recently released a set of style sheets for creating various page layouts using divs instead of tables.  I guess I just don&#39;t get why this is so desirable.  Looking at the code you have to create, I don&#39;t see how it&#39;s any less code than doing tables.  And I don&#39;t quite [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yahoo recently released a set of <a href="http://developer.yahoo.com/yui/grids/">style sheets</a> for creating various page layouts using divs instead of tables.  I guess I just don&#39;t get why this is so desirable.  Looking at the code you have to create, I don&#39;t see how it&#39;s any less code than doing tables.  And I don&#39;t quite buy the argument that this allows you to completely redesign your site without having to touch the markup.  In my experience we design our content to fit a particular layout and changing that layout will also result in a change needed in the content.  So the savings just aren&#39;t there.</p>
<p>But, I could be wrong.  This could be a great thing.  It just seems like tables are one of those things that are perfectly suited for creating layouts on a page that won&#39;t go all funky when you resize, have a different browser, etc.  I&#39;m all for moving styling into CSS, but I just don&#39;t see the reason to move away from tables for layout.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.glenc.net/2006/06/22/yahoo-grid-css-whats-the-point/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
