<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Look alive. Here comes a buzzard.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.glenc.net/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.glenc.net</link>
	<description>Treading water in a sea of man-made confusion.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2011 04:47:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on SPFarmInstaller &#8211; PowerShell Installation Scripts for SharePoint 2010 by glenc</title>
		<link>http://blog.glenc.net/2011/03/16/spfarminstaller-powershell-installation-scripts-for-sharepoint-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-47461</link>
		<dc:creator>glenc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2011 04:47:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.glenc.net/?p=156#comment-47461</guid>
		<description>Honestly I&#039;m not sure it&#039;s possible to change the names of the app pools.  If anybody else knows I&#039;m all ears, but I think that even though you give them a friendly name, in IIS they are still named with GUIDs.

BTW - sorry for the late reply, my email notification must not be working so I only just now saw your comment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Honestly I&#8217;m not sure it&#8217;s possible to change the names of the app pools.  If anybody else knows I&#8217;m all ears, but I think that even though you give them a friendly name, in IIS they are still named with GUIDs.</p>
<p>BTW &#8211; sorry for the late reply, my email notification must not be working so I only just now saw your comment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on SPFarmInstaller &#8211; PowerShell Installation Scripts for SharePoint 2010 by Ron Rohlfs</title>
		<link>http://blog.glenc.net/2011/03/16/spfarminstaller-powershell-installation-scripts-for-sharepoint-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-46818</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron Rohlfs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 20:15:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.glenc.net/?p=156#comment-46818</guid>
		<description>Hi,

Great set of scripts!  However, I am have difficulty with the Service Applications.  The scripts create Application Pools with GUID names instead of the names supplied in farmConfig.xml.  I&#039;ve stepped through the script during execution and found that in the GetOrCreateServiceApplicationPool function, New-SPServiceApplicationPool is called on line 776, but the line reads, &quot;$appPool = New-SPServiceApplicationPool $name -account $identity&quot;.  I changed it to read, &quot;$appPool = New-SPServiceApplicationPool -name $name -account $identity&quot; adding &quot;-name&quot;, but it didn&#039;t help.

Can you help me figure out how to get the scripts to create Application Pools using the names in farmConfig.xml?

Thnaks.

Ron Rohlfs</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>Great set of scripts!  However, I am have difficulty with the Service Applications.  The scripts create Application Pools with GUID names instead of the names supplied in farmConfig.xml.  I&#8217;ve stepped through the script during execution and found that in the GetOrCreateServiceApplicationPool function, New-SPServiceApplicationPool is called on line 776, but the line reads, &#8220;$appPool = New-SPServiceApplicationPool $name -account $identity&#8221;.  I changed it to read, &#8220;$appPool = New-SPServiceApplicationPool -name $name -account $identity&#8221; adding &#8220;-name&#8221;, but it didn&#8217;t help.</p>
<p>Can you help me figure out how to get the scripts to create Application Pools using the names in farmConfig.xml?</p>
<p>Thnaks.</p>
<p>Ron Rohlfs</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Region Folding in Textmate by glenc</title>
		<link>http://blog.glenc.net/2008/04/20/region-folding-in-textmate/comment-page-1/#comment-46055</link>
		<dc:creator>glenc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2011 00:56:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.glenc.net/2008/04/20/region-folding-in-textmate/#comment-46055</guid>
		<description>No - sorry.  But if you figure that out, please post the solution.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No &#8211; sorry.  But if you figure that out, please post the solution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Region Folding in Textmate by Dave</title>
		<link>http://blog.glenc.net/2008/04/20/region-folding-in-textmate/comment-page-1/#comment-45964</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2011 21:01:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.glenc.net/2008/04/20/region-folding-in-textmate/#comment-45964</guid>
		<description>Any chance you figured out how to maybe mark regions in a different color / style than regular comments?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any chance you figured out how to maybe mark regions in a different color / style than regular comments?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Customizing the Site Directory in MOSS 2007 by Mark</title>
		<link>http://blog.glenc.net/2006/07/23/customizing-the-site-directory-in-moss-2007/comment-page-2/#comment-41450</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 12:14:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogtmp.glenc.net/2006/07/23/customizing-the-site-directory-in-moss-2007/#comment-41450</guid>
		<description>HI, I like your article ! Very nice !

I was wondering though about the Autoarchive feature.

Is it possible to have the &quot;site use confirmation and deletion&quot; tool in the central administration to look at the sitedirectory only and not at the entire site collection?

Regards,
Mark</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HI, I like your article ! Very nice !</p>
<p>I was wondering though about the Autoarchive feature.</p>
<p>Is it possible to have the &#8220;site use confirmation and deletion&#8221; tool in the central administration to look at the sitedirectory only and not at the entire site collection?</p>
<p>Regards,<br />
Mark</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Copying a web part page including web parts by TD</title>
		<link>http://blog.glenc.net/2009/10/15/copying-a-web-part-page-including-web-parts/comment-page-1/#comment-41228</link>
		<dc:creator>TD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2010 13:59:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.glenc.net/?p=129#comment-41228</guid>
		<description>I just wanted to say a massive thank you for this! Not only is it a super time saver it has also in my instance sorted out a whole heap of SharePoint pain in the ass-edness with a glitchy page layout that looked fine on some pages and didn&#039;t on others.

Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just wanted to say a massive thank you for this! Not only is it a super time saver it has also in my instance sorted out a whole heap of SharePoint pain in the ass-edness with a glitchy page layout that looked fine on some pages and didn&#8217;t on others.</p>
<p>Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Calling SharePoint Web Services from Javascript by Jerry Lanphear</title>
		<link>http://blog.glenc.net/2007/04/20/calling-sharepoint-web-services-from-javascript/comment-page-1/#comment-39286</link>
		<dc:creator>Jerry Lanphear</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 02:05:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogtmp.glenc.net/2007/04/20/calling-sharepoint-web-services-from-javascript/#comment-39286</guid>
		<description>Glen,

I am on this quest too and I think my blood pressure has been raised by it.  I just returned home from an all day event with Scott Guthrie, Hanselman and Palermo. It was great, but with all the talk about open communication between systems it seems as though SharePoint has been left out in the cold.  

My current quest is leading me on a journey to solve the following:  Host an external website in a PageViewer webpart and somehow pass credentials and parameters to the external page.  It sounds funny that credentials need to be passed, but it&#039;s true as if the user has &quot;logged on as a different user&quot; the fact of this exists only in the session state.  The session state is not passed on to the PageViewer web part.  So, I have to use a content editor web part on a different page which will use JavaScript to call the web service to get the user and then call the PageViewer page with the credentials on the uri.  
I have been frustrated at every turn to make this happen.  Have you had any success in this area?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glen,</p>
<p>I am on this quest too and I think my blood pressure has been raised by it.  I just returned home from an all day event with Scott Guthrie, Hanselman and Palermo. It was great, but with all the talk about open communication between systems it seems as though SharePoint has been left out in the cold.  </p>
<p>My current quest is leading me on a journey to solve the following:  Host an external website in a PageViewer webpart and somehow pass credentials and parameters to the external page.  It sounds funny that credentials need to be passed, but it&#8217;s true as if the user has &#8220;logged on as a different user&#8221; the fact of this exists only in the session state.  The session state is not passed on to the PageViewer web part.  So, I have to use a content editor web part on a different page which will use JavaScript to call the web service to get the user and then call the PageViewer page with the credentials on the uri.<br />
I have been frustrated at every turn to make this happen.  Have you had any success in this area?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Oops.  I deleted the SSP Admin Site Collection&#8230; by alxdean</title>
		<link>http://blog.glenc.net/2007/09/07/oops-i-deleted-the-ssp-admin-site-collection/comment-page-1/#comment-36856</link>
		<dc:creator>alxdean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 22:55:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogtmp.glenc.net/2007/09/07/oops-i-deleted-the-ssp-admin-site-collection/#comment-36856</guid>
		<description>oops. just realised. was looking at wrong ssp. 
I have the same issue as JJ. those links are bust</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oops. just realised. was looking at wrong ssp.<br />
I have the same issue as JJ. those links are bust</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Oops.  I deleted the SSP Admin Site Collection&#8230; by Alxdean</title>
		<link>http://blog.glenc.net/2007/09/07/oops-i-deleted-the-ssp-admin-site-collection/comment-page-1/#comment-36855</link>
		<dc:creator>Alxdean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 22:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogtmp.glenc.net/2007/09/07/oops-i-deleted-the-ssp-admin-site-collection/#comment-36855</guid>
		<description>just followed these steps as I had a typo in the Web App Name for the ssp site which was driving me insane. 
worked like a dream. 
This actually means you could host the ssp admin site on the same web app as CA if you wanted to. ouch. scary thought.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>just followed these steps as I had a typo in the Web App Name for the ssp site which was driving me insane.<br />
worked like a dream.<br />
This actually means you could host the ssp admin site on the same web app as CA if you wanted to. ouch. scary thought.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Customizing the Site Directory in MOSS 2007 by Arno</title>
		<link>http://blog.glenc.net/2006/07/23/customizing-the-site-directory-in-moss-2007/comment-page-2/#comment-36744</link>
		<dc:creator>Arno</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 07:23:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogtmp.glenc.net/2006/07/23/customizing-the-site-directory-in-moss-2007/#comment-36744</guid>
		<description>What I find anoying in the sites directory, is that every user can see all the sites, including the sites this user does not have rights to.

anyone with a solution?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What I find anoying in the sites directory, is that every user can see all the sites, including the sites this user does not have rights to.</p>
<p>anyone with a solution?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

